Consumers International IP Watchlist

The Consumers International IP Watchlist identifies countries whose IP policies and practices are harmful to consumers. This Watch List is used as a counterbalance to the United States' Special 301 Report, which is an annual report highlighting those countries that supposedly do not provide strong enough protection for the interests of US intellectual property owners.

From 2009-2012, Consumers International published annual editions of the IP Watchlist, based on manually collated data. Those reports from 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 IP Watchlist Reports are still available.

From 2013, the collation of the report data is done automatically, so you can now view current statistics based on the reports that we have to hand day by day! As of Tuesday March 31, 2015, the five best and worst countries in our survey are shown below, based on how well their intellectual property regimes respect consumer rights. In this table A represents a good score, that shows that consumers' interests are being observed in this area. B, C and D are progressively not so good... and F is a fail. These are the overall scores; more details are available that break these scores into categories.

Best-rated countriesWorst-rated countries
1Moldova (B)Jordan (D)
2Israel (B)Kenya (D)
3India (B)Argentina (C-)
4Indonesia (B)Thailand (C-)
5New Zealand (B-)United Kingdom (C-)

Selected questions

This survey is based on the answers to 49 questions about IP laws and practices which can be answered "Yes", "No", or "In part". A select sample of those questions will be featured below from time to time. You can view the answers to all questions in the country reports below.

Array
(
    [1861] => No
    [95] => No
    [1864] => In part
    [17] => In part
    [202] => In part
    [1880] => Yes
    [103] => No
    [2018] => No
    [534] => Yes
    [1703] => In part
    [111] => No
    [110] => In part
    [2003] => No
    [2032] => No
    [548] => No
    [203] => In part
    [1875] => Yes
    [2033] => Yes
    [86] => Yes
    [107] => Yes
    [114] => No
    [1338] => In part
    [1685] => In part
    [547] => In part
    [532] => In part
    [2015] => No
    [1564] => No
    [1584] => Yes
    [1869] => In part
    [1721] => Yes
    [1726] => Yes
    [1542] => In part
    [1715] => Yes
    [97] => Yes
    [109] => No
    [1873] => In part
    [1872] => No
    [1862] => No
    [1649] => No
    [90] => No
    [87] => In part
    [531] => Yes
    [101] => No
    [545] => In part
    [133] => No
    [104] => In part
    [1717] => In part
    [1714] => Yes
)

Are rights holders prohibited from excluding user rights under copyright law?

For example, rights holders can use the fine print of a licence agreement to take away your legal right to make backup copies or quotations. To maintain balance between rights holders and consumers, it is important that the law prevent them from taking away your user rights through fine print. Unfortunately a majority of countries don't have such a law.

Array
(
    [1861] => Yes
    [95] => No
    [1864] => Yes
    [17] => In part
    [202] => No
    [1880] => Yes
    [103] => No
    [2018] => No
    [534] => No
    [1703] => Yes
    [111] => No
    [110] => No
    [2003] => No
    [2032] => No
    [548] => Yes
    [203] => No
    [1875] => In part
    [2033] => In part
    [86] => In part
    [107] => In part
    [114] => Yes
    [1338] => In part
    [1685] => No
    [547] => No
    [532] => In part
    [2015] => 
    [1564] => In part
    [1584] => No
    [1869] => Yes
    [1721] => No
    [1726] => No
    [1542] => In part
    [1715] => In part
    [97] => No
    [109] => Yes
    [1873] => No
    [1872] => Yes
    [1862] => In part
    [1649] => Yes
    [90] => In part
    [87] => In part
    [531] => Yes
    [101] => In part
    [545] => No
    [133] => No
    [104] => Yes
    [1717] => No
    [1714] => No
)

Is there any general user right that is based on a set of balancing criteria, such as a "fair use" right?

This deals with the availability of a flexible user right like "fair use", or "fair dealing" when this is not reserved for a specific purpose like education. Such a user right enables the law to adapt to new uses dynamically, and is the bedrock of online innovation in the relatively few countries that have it. Thankfully, we are slowly seeing more countries amending their laws to include a flexible right, and this is a trend that should continue.

Array
(
    [1861] => In part
    [95] => No
    [1864] => Yes
    [17] => Yes
    [202] => Yes
    [1880] => Yes
    [103] => No
    [2018] => No
    [534] => In part
    [1703] => In part
    [111] => Yes
    [110] => Yes
    [2003] => Yes
    [2032] => Yes
    [548] => Yes
    [203] => Yes
    [1875] => No
    [2033] => No
    [86] => Yes
    [107] => Yes
    [114] => Yes
    [1338] => In part
    [1685] => No
    [547] => In part
    [532] => In part
    [2015] => Yes
    [1564] => In part
    [1584] => No
    [1869] => Yes
    [1721] => Yes
    [1726] => Yes
    [1542] => Yes
    [1715] => Yes
    [97] => No
    [109] => Yes
    [1873] => Yes
    [1872] => Yes
    [1862] => Yes
    [1649] => No
    [90] => In part
    [87] => Yes
    [531] => Yes
    [101] => No
    [545] => No
    [133] => In part
    [104] => Yes
    [1717] => Yes
    [1714] => No
)

Are temporary or transient copies, incidental to a lawful use, excepted from copyright?

It is important for temporary copies to be left out of copyright, because such copies are made automatically every time we use a computer or the Internet. If the making of automatic temporary copies could be controlled by copyright owners (as proposed under the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement), the use of digital goods would become subject to their permission. The result? More expensive digital products, with more limitations on their use.

Statistics

Click through for a full page of more detailed statistics on how each country scored across eleven categories of questions. (If you want to see how the statistics were generated, we can enable an expert mode for you on request!) For even more detail, read on for the country reports below.

Below are the countries for which reports are available, along with an indication of how complete and current they are. For your convenience, an answer that supports consumer rights is answered "Yes" and colour-coded in green, whereas a problem area is answered "No" and coloured red.

To edit the report for your country (edits are moderated), create an account, log in, and click "Edit" while viewing the report you wish to edit. The newest questions will be highlighted in green, the most-recently amended ones in yellow. If your country is not listed, you can submit a new draft country report.

Country reports

Country Last Updated Completeness
Albania 4 years 4 weeks ago
63% complete
Argentina 3 years 1 week ago
69% complete
Armenia 3 years 1 week ago
73% complete
Australia 2 years 40 weeks ago
77% complete
Bangladesh 5 years 2 weeks ago
61% complete
Belarus 3 years 1 week ago
63% complete
Brazil 3 years 1 week ago
76% complete
Brazil 4 years 3 weeks ago
71% complete
Cameroon 3 years 1 week ago
49% complete
Canada 3 years 1 week ago
83% complete
Chile 3 years 1 week ago
55% complete
China (PRC) 3 years 1 week ago
94% complete
Costa Rica 3 years 1 week ago
77% complete
Costa Rica 3 years 5 weeks ago
77% complete
Egypt 3 years 1 week ago
75% complete
Fiji 3 years 3 weeks ago
59% complete
France 4 years 4 weeks ago
68% complete
France 3 years 1 week ago
67% complete
India 3 years 1 week ago
83% complete
Indonesia 3 years 1 week ago
65% complete
Israel 3 years 1 week ago
78% complete
Japan 2 years 49 weeks ago
76% complete
Jordan 3 years 1 week ago
86% complete
Kenya 5 years 2 weeks ago
49% complete
Lebanon 3 years 1 week ago
64% complete
Malawi 3 years 1 week ago
30% complete
Malaysia 3 years 1 week ago
71% complete
Mexico 5 years 2 weeks ago
80% complete
Moldova 4 years 3 weeks ago
61% complete
Morocco 5 years 2 weeks ago
56% complete
Morocco 5 years 2 weeks ago
56% complete
New Zealand 1 year 45 weeks ago
86% complete
Nigeria 5 years 2 weeks ago
68% complete
Pakistan 4 years 3 weeks ago
67% complete
Philippines 3 years 1 week ago
66% complete
Romania 3 years 1 week ago
71% complete
Serbia 4 years 4 weeks ago
51% complete
Slovenia 3 years 1 week ago
67% complete
South Africa 4 years 4 weeks ago
73% complete
South Korea 3 years 1 week ago
80% complete
Spain 3 years 1 week ago
89% complete
Sweden 5 years 2 weeks ago
61% complete
Thailand 3 years 1 week ago
66% complete
Ukraine 3 years 1 week ago
77% complete
United Kingdom 3 years 1 week ago
86% complete
United States of America 3 years 1 week ago
87% complete
Vietnam 5 years 2 weeks ago
50% complete
Zambia 5 years 2 weeks ago
47% complete

Creative Commons license icon
This work is licensed under a Attribution Share Alike Creative Commons license